Evaluation criteria

Spread the love

Evaluation criteria


Assessment of knowledge of applicants is carried out according to PROVISIONS ON THE ORGANIZATION OF THE EDUCATIONAL PROCESS ONTU


Each module of the discipline is evaluated by 100 pointsThe module is considered positively evaluatedif received 60 – 100 pointsAccording to the rating system of knowledge assessment, each module is evaluated based on theoretical and practical training (laboratorypracticalseminar classesand performing independent work.

Criteria for evaluating the knowledge of applicants

  1. Work in laboratory/practical classes

When working with a separate group or subgroup of students in laboratory/practical classeswhen work requires the activity of everyonethe difference between thosewho wants to learn as much as possiblenot only to actually acquire knowledgebut be able to use them to solve practical problemsbecomes more noticeableWhen certain practical tasks are performed by a small group of peopleiton the one handcontributes to thatthat when assigning responsibilities to the tasksolving it at a sufficiently high level involves all members of the group without exceptionAnd thus they acquire skills to work collectivelyOn the other hand, a leader always appears in such a situationwhichin turnacquires the skills of a lower level managerA certain plan of action is drawn up before the work is carried outafter its completion, the results are summarized and discussed together with the teacherThis contributes to the development of the ability to think independentlyplan your actionsbased on the knowledge gained during mastering the disciplineexplain and defend your opinionIn this case, the assessment of everyone’s activity dependsFirstfrom the ability of the group to solve the tasksecondly, from the ability to give certain explanations when defending one’s point of viewThe role of the leader is also taken into accountwho gets higher scores.

The total number of points for this type of work is close to 15 %.


points, %

Evaluation criterion
11 – 15 The student shows deep knowledgeclearlycompetentlylogically and consistently justifies his opinionhas alternative views on the possibilities of solving the given problemshows leadership qualities
6 – 10 The student independently solves the given taskbut is not always able to analyze and generalize the resultdemonstrates an above-average knowledge of the curriculum material with a few minor errorswhich do not significantly affect the final result.
0 – 5 The student is able to workperforming a separate taskhowever, he is incapable of independent planning of actions in this directionhe has difficulties in analyzing the obtained results.
  1. Independent work

A certain part of the materialwhich is not considered in lecturesthe student learns independentlyUsuallythis is easy to understand materialbut necessary for a holistic view when considering individual sections of the disciplineThe teacher monitors the availability of the appropriate synopsis andtaking into account whether the essence of individual issues is reflectedscores points.

Their total number is close to 10 %.


points, %

Evaluation criterion
8 – 10 The student showed deep knowledgeclearlycompetentlylogically and consistently formulates answers to questionsfully covers the problemExplaining the answergives successful examples.
4 – 7 The student uses terminology freelycompetently and to the point explains the answers to the questionsgross mistakes are not allowed when answering themhowever, it does not fully reveal the content
0 – 3 A studentdoes not teach the material consistentlyin a too concise formwith some inaccuracies in wording and terminology
  1. Individual work

These are separate taskswhich each student receives personallyThey can be compiled in the form of abstractsindividual questionsdirect answers to which cannot be found in information sourcescertain calculation problemstasksthe implementation of which requires conducting some experimental studiesWhen evaluating such work, the teacher takes into account not only the actual performance of such a taskbut the ability to provide the necessary explanationsreasonableness of the answer.

The total number of points is approx 25 % from the total amount


points, %

Evaluation criterion
18 – 25 The student demonstrates skills in working with information sourcesincluding foreign onesthe ability to generalize the received information and formulate questionsthe research of which is relevantThe student is able to make an informative reportbased on the prepared presentationdemonstrates mastery of the material when answering questionserudition.
8 – 17 The student is able to make a reportwhich demonstrates his awareness of the problem and directions for its solutionhowever, the answers to the questions are not always sufficiently complete and to the point.
0 – 8 When preparing the materialin particular, the student’s essay and presentation are assumed to contain inaccuraciesthe report is not consistentthe answers to the questions are not sufficiently complete and thorough..
  1. Modular control work

The most common variant of modular control work is a set of test taskswhich is usually not superior 50. If it is assumed to find two correct answers to the questionthe calculation of points for each test task takes this point into accountIn additionmore difficult test tasksessential for mastering the disciplineare evaluated with higher scoresThat is, there is a certain ranking hereSometimes the teacher considers it expedient to include open tests in the modular test workthey are usually rated higher.

The total maximum number of points for the module test is approaching 50 % from the total amount.


points, %

Evaluation criterion
34 – 50 The student has deep knowledgefully covers the problemclearlycompetentlylogically and consistently formulates answers to open test tasks
17- 33 The student demonstrates thorough knowledge of the disciplineable to solve complex taskshowever, a certain amount of error is assumedwhich slightly lower the overall score.
0 – 16 The student demonstrates the level of knowledgewhich allows you to orient yourself in the material in generalbut mistakes are made when answering questionsinaccuracies
Distribution of points for individual test tasks Evaluation criterion of test tasks
to 10 Open tests – fullspecificthorough answer
2 Closed testswhich contain complexfundamental questions for this topic
1 Closed tests – contain questionsthe knowledge of which is basic for orientation in the material of the discipline
  1. Exam

Exam tickets are similar in structure to modular control ticketshowever, they differ in thatcovering all the material of the discipline.

Evaluation criteria Level of competence The sum of points on the ONTU scale Evaluation on a national scale
exam diff. settlement
The student shows special creative abilitiesis able to independently acquire knowledgefinds and processes the necessary information without the help of the teacherknows how to use acquired knowledge and skills to make decisions in non-standard situationsconvincingly argues the answersindependently reveals his own gifts and inclinations High (creative) 88-100 perfectly
The student is fluent in the studied amount of materialapplies it in practicefreely solves exercises and problems in standard situationsindependently corrects the mistakes madethe number of which is insignificant Sufficient (constructive and variable) 81-87 good
The student knows how to comparegeneralizesystematize information under the teacher’s guidancein general, independently apply it in practicecontrol one’s own activitiescorrect mistakesamong which there are significant oneschoose arguments to support opinions 74-80
The student reproduces a significant part of the theoretical materialdemonstrates knowledge and understanding of basic provisionscan analyze educational material with the help of a teachercorrect mistakesamong which there are a significant number of essential ones Average (reproductive) 68-73 satisfactorily
The student possesses educational material at the levelhigher than the initial onea significant part of it reproduces at the reproductive level 60-67
The student knows the material at the level of individual fragmentswhich constitute an insignificant part of the educational material Low (receptive and productive) 40-59 unsatisfactorily
The student possesses the material at the level of elementary recognition and reproduction of individual factselementsobjects 0-39